After a successful trial to actively encourage authors to recommend diverse lists of reviewers for their papers, a reminder statement about diversity will now be rolled out across AGU journals.
Peer Review
Posted inEditors' Vox
Annotation Tool Facilitates Peer Review
AGU journals will incorporate open source software to facilitate dialog among reviewers, editors and authors during peer review.
Posted inOpinions
Red/Blue and Peer Review
Healthy skepticism has long formed the foundation of the scientific peer review process. Will anything substantively new be gleaned from a red team/blue team exercise?
Posted inEditors' Vox
Benefiting from Good Reviews: Part 2
Martyn Clark reflects on how his experiences of going through the peer review process as an author have influenced him as an editor.
Posted inEditors' Vox
Benefiting from Good Reviews: Part 1
Martyn Clark describes how thoughtful reviews can substantially enhance the quality and impact of published papers.
Posted inEditors' Vox
Stuff My Reviewers Say
After going through a little more than a decade's worth of reviews, Noah Diffenbaugh shares insights about the peer review process and how reviewer feedback ultimately improved his publications.
Posted inScience Updates
A Quick Guide to Writing a Solid Peer Review
Providing a peer review can be exhaustive and time-consuming. These tips will help you through the process.
Posted inFeatures
Data Citation and Peer Review
How does data citation fit into the world of science publishing?