Healthy skepticism has long formed the foundation of the scientific peer review process. Will anything substantively new be gleaned from a red team/blue team exercise?
Peer Review
Posted inEditors' Vox
Benefiting from Good Reviews: Part 2
Martyn Clark reflects on how his experiences of going through the peer review process as an author have influenced him as an editor.
Posted inEditors' Vox
Benefiting from Good Reviews: Part 1
Martyn Clark describes how thoughtful reviews can substantially enhance the quality and impact of published papers.
Posted inEditors' Vox
Stuff My Reviewers Say
After going through a little more than a decade's worth of reviews, Noah Diffenbaugh shares insights about the peer review process and how reviewer feedback ultimately improved his publications.
Posted inScience Updates
A Quick Guide to Writing a Solid Peer Review
Providing a peer review can be exhaustive and time-consuming. These tips will help you through the process.
Posted inFeatures
Data Citation and Peer Review
How does data citation fit into the world of science publishing?