For more than a century, astronomers have speculated—in vain—that a giant, unseen planet, or even a lurking sister star to the Sun, roams the fringes of the solar system.
Astronomer Percival Lowell, back in 1906, invoked a “Planet X” to explain the then unaccounted for motions of Uranus and Neptune. In 1984, researchers postulated that a dwarf star, dubbed Nemesis, periodically dipped into a relatively dense region of comets in the far reaches of the solar system, sending comets hurtling toward the inner solar system and causing an apparent 26-million-year cycle of mass extinctions on Earth. Those are just a couple of the ghost bodies that never did turn up.
Enter “Planet Nine.” In the 20 January Astronomical Journal, researchers reported new evidence of another such orb. Although the observations cited by study coauthors Mike Brown and Konstantin Batygin of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena are indirect and based on a new analysis of previously known data, the report has made a sensation, lighting up the journal’s website with nearly a quarter million downloads in the first 5 days since the paper was posted.
“Planet X is proposed every time someone sees some sort of anomaly in the outer solar system,” said Brown, an astronomer widely known for his role in helping to demote Pluto to a dwarf planet a decade ago. “Usually those [anomalies] end up being bad data. We think that this is the first time the data actually support the hypothesis,” he told Eos.
Kuiper Belt Objects Aligned
The data show an unexplained orbital alignment and common motion of six disparate objects in the Kuiper Belt, the doughnut-shaped reservoir of icy bodies, including Pluto, that lies beyond the orbit of Neptune. Those data have convinced some planetary scientists—but by no means all—that gravitational shepherding of the Kuiper Belt objects by a massive, distant planet best explains the mysteriously matching features.
In a postannouncement blog entry, Brown wrote, “From some very simple calculations, we can show that the probability of these alignments happening due to chance is only about 0.007%. You could also say that there is a 99.993% chance that the alignments we are seeing in the outer solar system are real, and that we are not simply being fooled into seeing a pattern where none exists.”
“This is the strongest evidence presented so far” for Planet X, said David Nesvorny of the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colo., who analyzes the dynamics of solar system objects but wasn’t involved in the new study.
In 2011, Nesvorny suggested that the present-day architecture of the solar system was best explained if the Sun originally had a fifth giant planet, in addition to Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. The additional planet would ultimately have been gravitationally kicked out of the solar system—unless a close encounter with a nearby star at just the right time stabilized the orbit, keeping Planet Nine at the solar system’s edge, Nesvorny told Eos.
Seeing Is Believing
The hypothetical planet would lie 7 times farther away than Neptune does, or at 200 astronomical units (AU), when closest to the Sun, on an elliptical orbit that might take it as far out as 1200 AU, Brown and Batygin reported. One astronomical unit is the average distance between the Earth and the Sun.
NASA’s Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) spacecraft, which observes at infrared wavelengths, has ruled out a distant solar system planet the size of Saturn out to 10,000 AU and an object the size of Jupiter out to 26,000 AU. But the much smaller Planet Nine would glow, dimly, in visible light, not infrared. Brown and Batygin have begun hunting for the object with the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan’s Subaru Telescope on Hawaii’s Mauna Kea.
Some researchers have reacted coolly to the Planet Nine hypothesis. “The paper presents some interesting arguments, [but] I think the claims are being made more strongly than the evidence merits,” said astronomer Brett Gladman of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, who was also not part of the study.
“The arguments that Konstantin and Mike have presented are clever and carefully worked out, but it’s not a slam dunk,” said exoplanet hunter David Latham of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass., likewise unassociated with the new Brown-Batygin work. “It’s still early in the community reaction to the announcement, and other clever people may come up with counterarguments.”
Alignment sans Planet
Astronomers Ann-Marie Madigan of the University of California, Berkeley, and Michael McCourt of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Mass., have already presented a different argument. In an article published in the Monthly Notices Letters of the Royal Astronomical Society on the same day that Brown and Batygin published their finding, Madigan and McCourt suggest that gravitational interactions among the myriad small icy objects in the outer solar system can suffice on their own to cause the orbital alignment of the six telltale objects in the Kuiper Belt that inspired the Planet Nine hypothesis.
The researchers’ simulations show that gravitational tugs among objects located from about 100 to 10,000 AU from the Sun would drive some of them to form a cone-shaped distribution, inclined to the Kuiper Belt, which in turn could cause the alignments Brown and Batygin studied. “This spontaneous behavior is just something that the disk does on its own—we don’t need to invoke an external reason [such as a ninth planet] for it,” said Madigan, who described her simulations at a 26 January lecture at the SETI Institute in Mountain View, Calif.
Madigan noted that observations can test the validity of her team’s hypothesis. In the past, she said, sky surveys generally weren’t looking for faint, distant solar system objects in orbits tilted out of the main Kuiper Belt disk because researchers didn’t think many such bodies existed. But two ongoing ground-based sky surveys, the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) and the Dark Energy Camera Legacy Survey (DECam Legacy Survey), can hunt for the cone-shaped distribution of objects that would tilt out of the plane in which the planets orbit the Sun. One object, dubbed 2013 RF98, which has the right coordinates to potentially be part of that distribution, has already been detected by DECam, she said.
Testable Predictions and Other Scenarios
“The good news is that both theories make testable predictions, and we will find out the right answer soon,” Madigan said.
In addition to aligning the modestly tilted orbits of some Kuiper Belt objects, Planet Nine should more radically reorient the orbits of other Kuiper Belt objects, simulations by Brown and Batygin predict. The unseen planet’s gravity would drive those additional objects into orbits completely perpendicular to the plane in which the solar system’s eight known planets orbit the Sun. Over the past 3 years, four such objects have been found. Finding more Kuiper Belt objects with this perpendicular orientation would strengthen the case for Planet Nine, Brown told Eos.
Planet Nine and the competing conical distribution of outer solar system objects don’t offer the only ways of explaining the alignments of the six Kuiper Belt objects that caught the attention of Brown and Batygin, according to Latham. For instance, a gravitational encounter with a star that passed near the solar system sometime in the last few hundred million years might also do the job, he said.
“How long would the pattern last without a Planet Nine to herd the objects?” Latham mused. “These are not necessarily new ideas, but now there is renewed motivation to look at them. It will be interesting to see if there is a flurry of papers exploring related ideas.”
—Ron Cowen, Freelance Science Journalist; email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Citation: Cowen, R. (2016), Proposed planet nine elicits cheers, yawns, hunt for proof, Eos, 97, doi:10.1029/2016EO045523. Published on 4 February 2016.
Text © 2016. The authors. CC BY-NC 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.