Neil Jacobs sits behind a microphone, speaking at his confirmation hearing.
Meteorologist and atmospheric scientist Neil Jacobs, perhaps best known for his involvement in “Sharpiegate,” was confirmed as the new leader of NOAA on Tuesday evening. Credit: Senate.gov

Meteorologist and atmospheric scientist Neil Jacobs was confirmed as the new leader of NOAA on Tuesday evening.

Jacobs has a PhD in atmospheric science and worked in weather monitoring before joining NOAA in 2018.

But Jacobs is perhaps most well-known for his role in “Sharpiegate.” In 2019, during his first term, President Trump claimed that Alabama was in the path of Hurricane Dorian. After the claim met pushback, the president held a press conference and showed members of the media a map of the hurricane’s path that had been altered with a Sharpie, and NOAA issued a statement backing Trump’s claim.

President Trump holds a hurricane path map in the Oval Office.
President Trump displayed a map that altered the projected path of Hurricane Dorian with Sharpie. (The inked-in addition extends the white “Potential track area” and includes the Florida Panhandle, southern Georgia, and southeastern Alabama.) Credit: The White House

At the time, Jacobs was the acting NOAA administrator, and had approved the unsigned statement. A National Academy of Public Administration report later found that his involvement with the statement violated NOAA’s scientific integrity policy.

At Jacobs’ confirmation hearing in July, he said that, if a similar situation arose in the future, he would handle it differently. He also said he supported proposed cuts to NOAA’s budget, and that his top priorities included staffing the National Weather Service office, reducing the seafood trade deficit, and “return[ing] the United States to the world’s leader in global weather forecast modeling capability.”

Jacobs made no mention of climate change in his opening statement. When asked whether he agreed that human activities are the dominant cause of observed warming over the last century, he noted “that natural signals are mixed in there” but that “human influence is certainly there” too.

The Senate voted 51-46 to confirm Jacobs, in a session during which they also confirmed a cluster of attorneys and ambassadors (including former NFL star Herschel Walker as ambassador to the Bahamas).

Carlos Martinez, a senior climate scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists, expressed concern in a statement published before Jacobs’ confirmation hearing.

“Despite his relevant expertise and career experience, Dr. Jacobs has already demonstrated he’s willing to undermine science and his employees for political purposes as he did during the infamous ‘Sharpiegate’ scandal,” Martinez wrote.

Bluesky post screenshot that reads: Standards are low, but despite Sharpiegate and the troubling ways (see UCS blog below) Jacobs contorts himself into not crossing the admin (which is how Isaacman failed his NASA confirmation), Jacobs is the best person we can hope to run NOAA. Perfect is the enemy of the good for the next 3 years.
Bluesky users reacted to the news. Credit: Michael Battalio @battalio.com via Bluesky‬

Others were more cautiously optimistic, noting his experience as a scientist. “It could be worse,” noted one Redditor. “He’s an actual atmospheric scientist and a known quantity.”

“I’m hopeful that he’s learned how to fight within the political system — because he is going to have to fight,” former NOAA administrator Rick Spinrad told Bloomberg in August.

—Emily Gardner (@emfurd.bsky.social), Associate Editor

A photo of a hand holding a copy of an issue of Eos appears in a circle over a field of blue along with the Eos logo and the following text: Support Eos’s mission to broadly share science news and research. Below the text is a darker blue button that reads “donate today.”
Text © 2025. AGU. CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Except where otherwise noted, images are subject to copyright. Any reuse without express permission from the copyright owner is prohibited.